President Obama says energy cuts are key to saving the planet
No related posts.
No related posts.
The blog owner requires users to be logged in to be able to vote for this post.
Alternatively, if you do not have an account yet you can create one here.
Powered by Vote It Up
Some of us remember the oil crisis back about 35 years ago. What has been done? What has science bothered to achieve in that period? How much effort was put into conservation since then? Not much.
We’ve heard this before from our politicians. to some this is new talk, to others of us it is the same old, same old.
Say….aint these the boys trying to predict the world’s “average” temperature based on measurements at the airport and above HVAC condenser units? Aint these the same self important a**holes that try to make their experiments arrive at a predisposed conclusion? Are not these the same idiots that manage to be wrong time after time? Please dont tell me they are democrats…………
“Only science can give us these breakthroughs which is why this week’s Nobel Laureate
The same people who also brought you:
The paper that John choose is by Paul Boyer who subsequently won the Nobel Prize in Chemistry.
As Douglas Allchin writes, “Biochemists were primed to celebrate. One might well have imagined that the achievement here would surely garner Boyer a Nobel prize.”
However, Boyer’s triumph was short-lived. One of Boyer’s grad students noticed that the results were sensitive to the concentration of succinate, a component of the Kreb’s cycle. Further work, including the discovery of Phosphohistidine in E. coli (which have no mitochondria), put a damper on the claim.
In 1981, Boyer bluntly said, “I was wrong.”
What happened? Boyer and his team missed a simple control. That is, they mistook other mitochondrial reactions for ATP synthethis. Phosphohistidine turned out to be important in the Kreb’s cycle, but not for ATP synthesis.
http://evilutionarybiologist.blogspot.com/2008/01/this-weeks-citation-classic-being-wrong.html
Yep only science.